2005
California Special Election
Election
Date: November 8, 2005
News Stories
Proposition
73: Parental Notification
Termination of Minor's Pregnancy. Waiting
Period and Parental Notification. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary:
Amends California Constitution to bar abortion on unemancipated
minor until 48 hours after physician notifies minor's parent/legal
guardian, except in medical emergency or with parental waiver. Permits
judicial waiver of notice based on clear and convincing evidence
of minor's maturity or minor's best interests. Physician must report
abortions performed on minors and State shall compile statistics.
Authorizes monetary damages for violation. Minor must consent to
abortion unless mentally incapable or in medical emergency. Permits
judicial relief if minor's consent to abortion is coerced.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
51% |
47% |
2% |
YES
+4 |
| |
44% |
56% |
N/A |
NO
+12 |
| |
43% |
54% |
3% |
NO
+11 |
| |
55% |
44% |
2% |
YES
+11 |
| |
51% |
39% |
10% |
YES
+12 |
| |
41% |
49% |
10% |
NO
+8 |
| |
58% |
42% |
N/A |
YES
+16 |
| |
43% |
53% |
5% |
NO
+10 |
| |
45% |
43% |
12% |
YES
+2 |
| |
42% |
48% |
10% |
NO
+6 |
| |
60% |
38% |
2% |
YES
+22 |
| |
59% |
39% |
2% |
YES
+20 |
| |
45% |
45% |
10% |
Even |
| |
44% |
48% |
8% |
NO
+4 |
| |
48% |
43% |
9% |
YES
+5 |
Proposition
74: Public School Teachers Tenure
Public School Teachers. Waiting Period for Permanent
Status. Dismissal. Initiative Statute
Summary:
Increases length of time required before a teacher may become
a permanent employee from two complete consecutive school years
to five complete consecutive school years; measure applies to teachers
whose probationary period commenced during or after the 2003-2004
fiscal year. Authorizes school boards to dismiss a permanent teaching
employee who receives two consecutive unsatisfactory performance
evaluations.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
48% |
51% |
1% |
NO
+3 |
| |
46% |
54% |
N/A |
NO
+8 |
| |
45% |
52% |
3% |
NO
+7 |
| |
49% |
50% |
2% |
NO
+1 |
| |
45% |
47% |
8% |
NO
+2 |
| |
44% |
50% |
6% |
NO
+6 |
| |
53% |
47% |
N/A |
YES
+6 |
| |
42% |
53% |
5% |
NO
+11 |
| |
44% |
47% |
9% |
NO
+3 |
| |
46% |
48% |
6% |
NO
+2 |
| |
53% |
45% |
1% |
YES
+8 |
| |
55% |
44% |
2% |
YES
+10 |
| |
43% |
47% |
10% |
NO
+4 |
| |
46% |
37% |
17% |
YES
+9 |
| |
49% |
42% |
9% |
YES
+7 |
| |
61% |
32% |
7% |
YES
+29 |
Proposition
75: Union
Dues -- Political Contributions
Public Employee Union Dues. Required Employee Consent for Political
Contributions. Initiative Statute.
Summary: Prohibits public employee labor organizations from
using dues or fees for political contributions unless the employee
provides prior consent each year on a specified written form. Prohibition
does not apply to dues or fees collected for charitable organizations,
health care insurance, or other purposes directly benefiting the
public employee. Requires labor organizations to maintain and submit
to the Fair Political Practices Commission records concerning individual
employees' and organizations' political contributions; those records
are not subject to public disclosure.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
45% |
54% |
1% |
NO
+9 |
| |
52% |
47% |
N/A |
YES
+5 |
| |
48% |
49% |
3% |
NO
+1 |
| |
50% |
49% |
2% |
YES
+1 |
| |
40% |
51% |
9% |
NO
+11 |
| |
40% |
50% |
10% |
NO
+10 |
| |
64% |
36% |
N/A |
YES
+28 |
| |
50% |
45% |
5% |
YES
+5 |
| |
44% |
45% |
11% |
NO
+1 |
| |
46% |
46% |
8% |
Even |
| |
56% |
42% |
2% |
YES
+14 |
| |
60% |
37% |
3% |
YES
+23 |
| |
55% |
32% |
13% |
YES
+23 |
| |
48% |
33% |
9% |
YES
+15 |
| |
57% |
34% |
9% |
YES
+23 |
Proposition
76: State Spending Limits
School Funding. State Spending. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary: Changes state minimum school funding requirements
(Proposition 98), permitting suspension of minimum funding, but
terminating repayment requirement, and eliminating authority to
reduce funding when state revenues decrease. Excludes above-minimum
appropriations from schools' funding base. Limits state spending
to prior year total plus revenue growth. Shifts excess revenues
from schools/tax relief to budget reserve, specified construction,
debt repayment. Requires Governor to reduce state appropriations,
under specified circumstances, including employee compensation,
state contracts. Continues prior year appropriations if new state
budget delayed. Prohibits state special funds borrowing. Requires
payment of local government mandates.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
39% |
59% |
2% |
NO
+20 |
| |
34% |
66% |
N/A |
NO
+32 |
| |
40% |
56% |
3% |
NO
+16 |
| |
49% |
49% |
2% |
Even |
| |
42% |
56% |
2% |
NO
+14 |
| |
36% |
61% |
2% |
NO
+25 |
| |
31% |
60% |
9% |
NO
+29 |
| |
32% |
60% |
8% |
NO
+28 |
| |
45% |
55% |
N/A |
NO
+10 |
| |
36% |
59% |
5% |
NO
+23 |
| |
28% |
60% |
12% |
NO
+32 |
| |
30% |
62% |
8% |
NO
+32 |
| |
54% |
41% |
5% |
YES
+13 |
| |
58% |
36% |
6% |
YES
+22 |
| |
26% |
63% |
11% |
NO
+37 |
| |
19% |
65% |
16% |
NO
+46 |
| |
28% |
61% |
11% |
NO
+33 |
| |
35% |
42% |
23% |
NO
+7 |
Proposition 77: Redistricting
Reapportionment.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary: Amends state Constitution’s process for redistricting
California’s Senate, Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization
districts. Requires three-member panel of retired judges, selected
by legislative leaders, to adopt new redistricting plan if measure
passes and again after each national census. Panel must consider
legislative, public proposals/comments and hold public hearings.
Redistricting plan becomes effective immediately when adopted by
judges’ panel and filed with Secretary of State. If voters subsequently
reject redistricting plan, process repeats. Specifies time for judicial
review of adopted redistricting plan; if plan fails to conform to
requirements, court may order new plan.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
41% |
56% |
2% |
NO
+15 |
| |
40% |
60% |
N/A |
NO
+20 |
| |
41% |
52% |
6% |
NO
+11 |
| |
44% |
53% |
3% |
NO
+9 |
| |
34% |
56% |
10% |
NO
+22 |
| |
35% |
51% |
14% |
NO
+16 |
| |
55% |
45% |
N/A |
YES
+10 |
| |
42% |
46% |
12% |
NO
+4 |
| |
38% |
41% |
21% |
NO
+3 |
| |
36% |
50% |
14% |
NO
+14 |
| |
54% |
41% |
5% |
YES
+13 |
| |
59% |
36% |
5% |
YES
+23 |
| |
33% |
50% |
17% |
NO
+17 |
| |
32% |
46% |
22% |
NO
+14 |
| |
34% |
49% |
17% |
NO
+15 |
| |
35% |
46% |
19% |
NO
+11 |
Proposition
78: Drug Discounts (Industry Backed)
Prescription Drugs. Discounts. Initiative Statute.
Summary: Establishes discount prescription drug program,
overseen by the Department of Health Services. Enables certain low
- and moderate - income California residents to purchase prescription
drugs at reduced prices. Imposes $15 application fee, renewable
annually. Requires Department's prompt determination of residents'
eligibility, based on listed qualifications. Authorizes Department
to contract with pharmacies to sell prescription drugs at agreed-upon
discounts negotiated in advance, and to negotiate rebate agreements
with drug manufacturers. Permits outreach programs to increase public
awareness. Creates state fund for deposit of rebate payments from
drug manufacturers. Allows program to be terminated under specified
conditions.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
49% |
51% |
N/A |
NO
+2 |
| |
33% |
55% |
13% |
NO
+22 |
| |
38% |
43% |
19% |
NO
+5 |
| |
36% |
45% |
19% |
NO
+9 |
| |
51% |
49% |
N/A |
YES
+2 |
| |
39% |
45% |
16% |
NO
+6 |
| |
39% |
38% |
23% |
YES
+1 |
| |
43% |
38% |
19% |
YES
+5 |
| |
49% |
31% |
20% |
YES
+18 |
| |
57% |
26% |
17% |
YES
+31 |
Proposition
79: Drug Discounts (Consumer Groups Backed)
Prescription Drug Discounts. State-Negotiated Rebates. Initiative
Statute.
Summary: Provides for prescription drug discounts to Californians
who qualify based on income-related standards, to be funded through
rebates from participating drug manufacturers negotiated by California
Department of Health Services. Rebates must be deposited in State
Treasury fund, used only to reimburse pharmacies for discounts and
to offset administration costs. At least 95% of rebates must go
to fund discounts. Prohibits new Medi-Cal contracts with manufacturers
not providing the Medicaid best price to this program, except for
drugs without therapeutic equivalent. Establishes oversight board.
Makes prescription drug profiteering, as defined, unlawful.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
49% |
51% |
N/A |
NO
+2 |
| |
38% |
46% |
16% |
NO
+8 |
| |
30% |
47% |
23% |
NO
+17 |
| |
37% |
43% |
20% |
NO
+6 |
| |
50% |
50% |
N/A |
Even |
| |
43% |
40% |
17% |
YES
+3 |
| |
37% |
39% |
24% |
NO
+2 |
| |
34% |
40% |
26% |
NO
+6 |
| |
42% |
34% |
24% |
YES
+8 |
| |
48% |
33% |
19% |
YES
+15 |
Proposition
80: Electricity Regulation
Electric Service Providers. Regulation. Initiative Statute.
Summary: Subjects electric service providers, as defined,
to control and regulation by California Public Utilities Commission.
Imposes restrictions on electricity customers' ability to switch
from private utilities to other electric providers. Provides that
registration by electric service providers with Commission constitutes
providers' consent to regulation. Requires all retail electric sellers,
instead of just private utilities, to increase renewable energy
resource procurement by at least 1% each year, with 20% of retail
sales procured from renewable energy by 2010, instead of current
requirement of 2017. Imposes duties on Commission, Legislature and
electrical providers.
| Poll |
YES
|
NO |
Und |
Spread |
| |
37% |
63% |
N/A |
NO
+26 |
| |
25% |
48% |
27% |
NO
+23 |
| |
24% |
48% |
28% |
NO
+24 |
| |
46% |
54% |
N/A |
NO
+8 |
| |
22% |
48% |
30% |
NO
+26 |
| |
33% |
35% |
32% |
NO
+2 |
No,
No, No, No, No, No, No, No - Los Angeles Times (11/9)
Eight
Measures, Including Four Supported by the Guv, Are Defeated -
SF Chronicle (11/9)
Schwarzenegger
Vows Cooperation in Face of Defeat - Sacramento Bee (11/9)
Analysis:
Why His 'Sequel' Failed to Captivate - Los Angeles Times (11/9)
Governor, Opponents Busy with Last-Day Campaigning - Sacramento
Bee (11/8)
Fierce
Bid for Votes - San Jose Mercury News (11/8)
6.8
Million Expected to Vote Today - San Francisco Chronicle (11/8)
Absentee
Clout on the Rise - Sacramento Bee (11/8)
Generous Campaign Donors Showing No Signs of Fatigue - Los Angeles
Times (11/8)
In Unions, Governor Finds Nest of Hornets - San Diego Union-Tribune
(11/7)
Both
Sides Emphasize Election's Magnitude - Los Angeles Times (11/7)
Governor
Accuses His Foes of Scare Tactics - San Francisco Chronicle (11/7)
Schwarzenegger
Stakes Political Future - Christian Science Monitor (11/7)
This
Time, Schwarzenegger May Not Get a Hollywood Ending - New York
Times (11/7)
'06
Office Seekers Stay in Picture - Sacramento Bee (11/7)
Beatty, Bening Try to Crash the Gov.'s Party - Los Angeles Times
(11/6)
Governor
About to Get Answer on What Voters Think of Agenda - Union-Tribune
(11/6)
Schwarzenegger
Has Most to Lose in Election - San Francisco Chronicle (11/6)
|