March
22, 2005
Cruel and Unusual
By Thomas
Sowell
If the
tragic case of Terri Schiavo shows nothing else, it shows how
easily "the right to die" can become the right to kill.
It is hard to believe that anyone, regardless of their position
on euthanasia, would have chosen the agony of starvation and dehydration
as the way to end someone's life.
A New York
Times headline on March 20th tried to assure us: "Experts
Say Ending Feeding Can Lead to a Gentle Death" but you can
find experts to say anything. In a December 2, 2002 story in the
same New York Times, people starving in India were reported as
dying, "often clutching pained stomachs."
No murderer
would be allowed to be killed this way, which would almost certainly
be declared "cruel and unusual punishment," in violation
of the Constitution, by virtually any court.
Terri Schiavo's
only crime is that she has become an inconvenience -- and is caught
in the merciless machinery of the law. Those who think law is
the answer to our problems need to face the reality that law is
a crude and blunt instrument.
Make no mistake
about it, Terri Schiavo is being killed. She is not being "allowed
to die."
She is not
like someone whose breathing, blood circulation, kidney function,
or other vital work of the body is being performed by machines.
What she is getting by machine is what all of us get otherwise
every day -- food and water. Depriving any of us of food and water
would kill us just as surely, and just as agonizingly, as it is
killing Terri Schiavo.
Would I want
to be kept alive in Terri Schiavo's condition? No. Would I want
to be killed so slowly and painfully? No. Would anyone? I doubt
it.
Every member
of Terri Schiavo's family wants her kept alive -- except the one
person who has a vested interest in her death, her husband. Her
death will allow him to marry the woman he has been living with,
and having children by, for years.
Legally,
he is Terri's guardian and that legal technicality is all that
gives him the right to starve her to death. Courts cannot remove
guardians without serious reasons. But neither should they refuse
to remove guardians with a clear conflict of interest.
There are
no good solutions to this wrenching situation. It is the tragedy
of the human condition in its most stark form.
The extraordinary
session of Congress, calling members back from around the country,
with the President flying back from his home in Texas in order
to be ready to sign legislation dealing with Terri Schiavo, are
things that do us credit as a nation.
Even if critics
who claim that this is being done for political or ideological
reasons are partially or even wholly correct, they still miss
the point. It is the public's sense of concern -- in some cases,
outrage -- that is reflected by their elected representatives.
What can
Congress do -- and what effect will it have? We do not know and
Congress does not know. Those who are pushing for legislation
to save Terri Schiavo are obviously trying to avoid setting a
precedent or upsetting the Constitutional balance.
It is an
old truism that hard cases make bad law. No one wants all such
cases to end up in either Congress or the federal courts. But
neither do decent people want an innocent woman killed because
she was inconvenient and a court refused to recognize the conflict
of interests in her legal guardian.
The fervor
of those who want to save Terri Schiavo's life is understandable
and should be respected, even by those who disagree. What is harder
to understand is the fervor and even venom of those liberals who
have gone ballistic -- ostensibly over state's rights, over the
Constitutional separation of powers, and even over the sanctity
of family decisions.
These are
not things that liberals have any track record of caring about.
Is what really bothers them the idea of the sanctity of life and
what that implies for their abortion issue? Or do they hate any
challenge to the supremacy of judges -- on which the whole liberal
agenda depends -- a supremacy that the Constitution never gave
the judiciary?
If nothing
else comes out of all this, there needs to be a national discussion
of some humane way to end life in those cases when it has to be
ended -- and this may not be one of those cases.
Copyright
2005 Creators Syndicate
Send
This Article to a Friend